04.03.08

Self-Directed Studies

Posted in education, planner, think think think at 3:10 am by Rach

Welcome to our Self-Directed Studies guidelines that we have put together for ourselves and the children. No reading today….but definitely well on the way to getting an education!

11.01.07

from Iraq to China

Posted in adult, history, political, think think think at 4:06 am by Rach

Mayada
Mayada Daughter of Iraq
One Woman’s Survival in Saddam Hussein’s Torture Jail
by Jean Sasson

Mother's Ordeal: One Woman's Fight Against China's One-Child Policy
A Mother’s Ordeal: One Woman’s Fight Against China’s One-Child Policy
by Steven W. Mosher

Spot the similarities?
both are harrowing, yet compelling, reading
both present a fight against injustice
in both, *one woman* makes a difference

It’s been a couple of years since I read the China book – but there are still scenes from it firmly implanted in my memory. Nothing will ever erase them.
I finished Mayada today. Likewise, I will not forget.

The question for me becomes *what can I do about it?*
It is not enough to know.
It is not even enough to remember.
But I don’t know what to do.

Certainly I will share these books with my children when they are older.
But this is not sufficient.
What solutions will we find?

10.06.07

conversation overheard

Posted in discussion, education, think think think at 8:16 am by Rach

Actually, I didn’t hear much of it, but I heard enough to make me think.

It’s Saturday afternoon, the children are scattered around our section eagerly slurping the first homemade iceblocks of summer spring. The eldest three (13, 11, 10) are perched atop the swing set.

“The book I’m reading…”

My heart has tuned in even before my ears have registered the sound, but sadly, the voice drops in seriousness and volume preventing my auditory apparatus from capturing the dialogue…..until in a burst of excitement and needful clarification (brother WILL understand better if she speaks louder, right?) she booms, “two *leagues*, two *leagues* they moved.”

I still don’t know if he had thought two legs had moved or two fleas or two something elses. I do know now why J13 didn’t ask “what’s a league?” when we read Charge of the Light Brigade the other day. And judging by the understanding on the faces of the boys sharing the sunny literary moment with her, they also had had little need of a motherly explanation.
I love that it’s not all up to me. I constantly ask God to lead us in This Thing Called Education, and occasionally I get little glimpses like this one into how He is weaving the threads together more intricately than I could design.

Half a league, half a league,
half a league onward…..

10.05.07

blue domes, green grass, men on horseback and an eagle

Posted in discussion, education, think think think at 12:48 am by Rach

We’ve had a very on-again-off-again relationship with poetry in our family.

Today I worked out *why*

I have always tried to *do poetry* with the kids, because I thought it was something we should do. Never mind that I was a little scared of it and still allowed such words as “boring” to be placed in close proximity to “poetry”, yea, even in the same sentence.

That said, we have been *doing* poetry this year, and it’s been remarkably on-again, rather than off-again. We’ve delighted in childhood rhymes from “Lavender’s Blue”, giggled with Edward Lear’s hilarity, wandered country lanes with Emily Dickinson and William Wordsworth.

But this week poetry changed for us, because it changed for me.
This week we met Alfred, Lord Tennyson. 
Ordinarilly, his title alone would have been enough to give me the jitters, but, well, maybe I’m growing up. I enquired of the gentleman (for surely such he is, with a name like that), “Sir, what have you to teach us?”

The first poem on the page may well have been wonderful, but the second one was SHORT. Six lines. Thoughts of methodically working through the forty poems were abandoned instantly. Six lines it was to be.

I read them out, feeling a little like I was cheating, because it happened to be the very poem mentioned in one of the booklets I had read earlier this week. I omitted the title, and didn’t even get to ask the children what they thought it was about when one of them cried out “It’s an eagle!” *connection * success * thrill *
We re-read the poem and worked out how they knew, what clues had given it away. That was for my benefit, not the children’s;-)

Yesterday I flicked through the pages wondering if there was another short one.
There wasn’t, but Number Eight was “Charge of the Light Brigade”
I’ve heard of that! It’s famous. How about we read that one.

Half a league, half a league,
half a league onward…..

The rhythm grabbed us.
Then the story.
The tragedy.

We HAD to read it again.

We had to discuss the lines
Their’s not to make reply,
Their’s not to question why,
Their’s but to do and die:

What a powerful piece.
I now loved poetry and I was sharing a new-found love with the children.
Not that I realised this yesterday.

Today we didn’t *do poetry*
But I read Early Spring to the children. It’s spring here and it seemed an appropriate piece. I’m sure there are many things to be learnt from this poem, but we just talked about the ones we loved this time.

Once more the Heavenly Power
Makes all things new,
And domes the red-plow’d hills
With loving blue;

We talked about the changing sky.
We talked about using a noun as a verb and decided if the boys were writing a poem about their shaghais, they just might say they “rubber-banded the stone across the garden” ;-)

And speaking of interesting ways of using words, how about this line?
blah-de-blah-de something falls
on greening grass,

Can’t you just see the snow melting away and the new grass pushing up, making the ground so green the adjective should be turned into a verb, a “doing word”?

At that moment it struck me.
I was talking with the children about something I was loving myself. And that is oh so right when they are in the Love of Learning stage. Poetry isn’t something we just do, because we should. It is so much richer if I am sharing something I am newly-excited about. And this morning I was.

That is not to say some day I will not grapple with poetry. I expect to. I’m getting my Scholar Education and so it *can* be hard, it’s supposed to be, I will dedicate myself to struggling with ideas and learning…but just before I start that, before I jump into the Scholar Phase of Poetry,  I’m having my own little Love Of Learning phase, setting the scene for the work that is to come, and the children are tagging along.

10.04.07

movies are educational too

Posted in review, think think think at 8:24 am by Rach

A little idea grew into a whole blog-post….and as it developed I realised it would not be out of place on this blog. I also realised that I am fortunate to have some friends with whom I can get together, watch a movie and then critique and discuss. Of course, I always knew they were special friends, they were part of my life; now I also see them as part of my education. That’s my Thomas Jefferson Education happening!!!!
So I *had* to record it here.
Here findeth ye my first movie review (well, it’s more a wee discussion than a review, but that’s the best I can do tonight!)

Presenting…As It Is In Heaven

10.01.07

A Recipe for Success

Posted in education, think think think at 9:19 am by Rach

I teach the children to get out all the ingredients they need BEFORE starting to bake – I’m going to do the same using the DeMilles’ ingredient list in their Recipe for Success publication.

  • Sundays: so far we have not had “Family Executive Committee meetings” (ie mama and papa discuss the week together), and although hubby does not enjoy meetings so much he does a great job of presiding over them in his workplace and I’m sure he could do the same at home too. I love the concept and will be asking him to consider making this a part of our week. We don’t have individual meetings with teh chidlren either, but again, I think this is a great idea and something I’d like to incorporate into our weeks.
  • Weeks: we tend to plan out further in advance than one week blocks, but we usually get a bit bogged down by about week three. I’m going to try the week-by-week thing.
  • Mornings: full and brimming over round here (mostly)
  • Kidschool: I balk at the term, but the concept we have embraced. I do Scripture revision and singing with the children before we even get down from the breakfast table. Then chores happen and we come together again for read-alouds (usually some poetry and something else – history, science, literature, biography) while the kids do something quietly (knit, embroider, blocks, puzzle). We then all head for the dining room table and *do something* We’ve mastered the “structure time, not content” bit!!
  • Bean Counter Game: we have our own version with little bits of lego moving from one jar to another. I need to “play” it more though! Tomorrow we’ll start with tidy bedrooms and clean ears;-)
  • The Six Month Purge: we did this recently – and indeed, do it regularly – usually it stems from getting frustrated at all the *stuff* around and so I am hoping that having it as a regularly scheduled event might help avoid the angst.
  • The Six Month “No”: getting rid of time clutter. For me this time it has meant saying no to turning the computer on before the children are in bed at night. Let’s see what difference it makes.
  • The Six Month Inventory: I’ve probably done this about five times in total in the last decade!! Never too late to start. These six-monthly things I think will happen in spring and autumn. So some time this week, I’ll be doing an inventory of each child – it will give us something to work with in the Sunday meetings if they start too.
  • The Annual Project: for the past three years our LOLers who were old enough have taken part in the University of Auckland Science Competition. They have worked exceedingly hard, dragged everyone else along in their excitement (and through the sheer hard work bits too) and have been overwhelmed to win the last two years (and place third for the one who entered for the first time this year). The enormity of these projects probalby counts! Next year’s project will be The Trip.
  • The Annual Break: we have experimented with all sorts of different rhythms for our year and we’re getting good at the break bit;-) Hubby and I try to get away for one weekend each year or so without the children. We take little weekend breaks as a family, and the last two years we have started camping for a couple of weeks at Christmas with another family too.
  • Afternoons: we use our afternoons as suggested EXCEPT that the children probably just think of me being “on the computer” rather than studying (even when that’s what I’m doing) so I want to spend more time reading in the lounge where they can see me taking notes and turning pages. We get together with another family once a week, which seems to work well.
  • Evenings: I’ve realised the older children who are up for about an hour more than the younger ones have defaulted in the past few weeks to watching a DVD or playing a computer game. I don’t want for them to get in the habit of just turning on such entertainment as a matter of course and so I am going to get out the board games or a special book for the bulk of their time before they head off to bed.
  • Winters: we’ve just come through another winter and it meant lots of books. Sounds like we’re on track.
  • Summers: we’ll be found working together in the garden, pickling veges and making jams
  • The Weekly Club: we meet with the E family once a week “for the express purpose of not playing sports” (heehee, sorry lads). I have enjoyed watching the children pick up new interests off each other – it may not be a “formal” institutionalised club, but these visits serve the same purpose as far as I can see.
  • The Binder: I’m in the process of (and have been all year!) making pencil rolls for each child. That’s a start! The ones who have the inclination and skills also have various journals which seem similar to the binder – creation journals, memory verse journals, poetry journals, recipe books, diaries. They are not all collated in one binder, but the record is there. I like the idea of collecting their six-monthly-goals somewhere. Maybe it could go with their reading lists and finance records.
  • The Field Trip: we do take occasional trips to the beach, museums, the park……to make these even more beneficial, we could allow more time for sitting quietly together, allowing conversations to develop more.
  • The Library Trip: we do this!
  • The Bookshelf: oh what sweet permission – to let the little kids’ shelves be messy!!!!!!!!
    I’m not sure I can get my head round the LOL books being “not arranged by topic”. I can understand the thinking behind the suggestion, but we have so many books we’d never find them if they were all just arranged haphazardly on the shelves – we also ahve a great many bookshelves in our home! Some of them are taboo to the littlies – is this the same as devoting the top shelves to Scholar books and bottom shelves to littlies’ books? Yes, it might be, but what about the LOL books? They’re all arranged by topic – the Ancients on this shelf (nonfiction works as well as ripping good yarns and stories on tape all crammed in together), art books on that shelf, foreign languages and dictionaries here, sciencey books there, the few maths books stacked together, biographies taking up two shelves……I need to think more on this one.
  • The Closet: we don’t have a lock! In fact, the closet is actually a set of open shelves in one room and a cupboard in another – and neither of them are in the same room as most of the bookshelves as the DeMilles suggest is ideal, but it’s the way it works in our house. The cupboard is full of gear that can be used while I’m reading aloud and the open shelves in the dining room are for use at ”table time”.  If I could work out how to control it better, the children would only have access to these shelves under my supervision, but this is an area of (dare I call it) rebellion? or is it just that I am not consistent enough in enforcing consequences for kids helpingthemselves to materials and leaving a mess? I like the idea of a big fat lock;-)
  • The Family Room: we have two rooms that serve as family rooms – both have big open carpetted spaces for lounging on. One has comfy couches and chairs, the other has only one comfy rocking chair (for me – heehee), but is the warmer room in winter. This room does not contain a television – but neither does it have the bookshelves. The bookshelves are (shock, horror) in the same room as the tv – I sincerely hope the DeMilles’ prophecy will not ring true for us because of this set-up: “A room with the television or a computer, even if they are turned off most of the time, will never boast a daily brood of world class education at all levels.”
  • The Entertainment Room: this is *supposed* to be separate from the family room. It’s “one of those huge details that people like to ignore.” Yes, that’s me. Not ignoring, but not fully understanding. Maybe if we find this whole thing is almost-but-not-quite-working, I might consider asking hubby if the tv can be moved to the study (then only half the family would be able to watch it any given time as we wouldn’t all fit in the room, but at least it would then be with the computer!). I just don’t get why this is so important. We are discerning about how we use the television. We *could* play all our games in the family room so we are not in the same room as the tv, but I don’t understand why we need to. The comfy couches are in the lounge where the tv is. Sometimes we choose to play or read in there; sometimes we do it at the dining room table; sometimes out under the plum tree. It seems silly to only use the lounge for viewing DVDs (which we don’t do often).
  • The Donation Box: we have the concept in theory – we just don’t fill the box and take the stuff away! How about we start doing it on the first Saturday of every month – that’s this week.
  • The Storage Box: we’ve done this once and there wasn’t much in the boxes that we wanted to keep after a year! I do think once you’ve learnt to become more ruthless with the Donation Box, you no longer need a storage box!
  • The Weekly Lesson: we haven’t started any outside lessons yet. J13 is teaching herself to play the piano and could benefit from other instruction. At this stage she is still at a level that I can provide what help she needs, but when she moves beyond my abilities, I think it’s a fantastic (and obvious) idea to look for a teacher who will use the 7 Keys. I’m not sure how to find someone like that, but prayer may bring an answer.
  • The Safety Kids Class: don’t know anything about this.
  • The Mom School:
  • The Computer: I *like* the idea that it is an adult tool for writing. Need to talk to hubby about this. We started off trewating it this way, but recently the 6-10 year olds have started playing some “educational” games. More than the older ones ever did. Time to revisit the discussion.
  • The Kitchen Table: we already discuss things during preparation and eating time. Always room for improvement though.
  • The Cleaning Time: generally works OK. Could do better if I supervised better.
  • The Academic “No”: I don’t think we’re in any danger of pushing any of the kids too fast too soon. That paradigm shift is complete.
  • The Discipline “No”: we’re not scared of this oen – but need to work on doing it with gentlesness.
  • The Yard: we’re blessed to have a goodie
  • The Evening Reading List: Little Britches; Man of the Family; Mary Emma and Company; The Fields of Home; Laddie; Where the Red Fern Grows; Pollyanna; Carry on Mr Bowditch; Charlotte’s Web; Little House in the Big Woods; Little House on the Prairie, Farmer Boy; Trumpet of the Swan; The Cricket in Times Square
    We’ve read half of these and will read the rest. Plus we’re collating our own set of favourite books too.
  • The Chores: what do you do when the kids don’t see the chores they are doing as “real”? when it doesn’t matter to them if the house is dirty or messy?
  • Grandparent Mentoring: we are very fortunate to have one Grandpa living right next door, and we spend time with him nearly every single day. Just having him around is a huge blessing and ahs inspired the children in a number of ways, even without specific efforts at mentoring.
  • Teaching The Model: On the tail of the six-monthly inventory would be a good time to teach this (the 7 keys and 4 phases) each year. Once it is internalised for us, we will talk more freely about ti too. I have mentioned it to the older children, but we’ve got A LOT more talking to do about it – and we need to wait until hubby has read anmd we have discussed together where we are going with it all.
  • The Central Classic: the Bible is ours. We could do better at reading it together as a family.
  • The Awakening: just need to wait for this to happen!
  • The Interruption “Yes”: I agree it is so important to give focussed attention to the littlies when they need you. I also like the idea (gleaned from elsewhere) that if you fill them up with attention first thing, they’ll play more happily alongside you for longer wihtout needing you to watch their every move.
  • The “Feminist”: in this definition there certainly is “a powerful example of challenging, fulfilling exciting feminine ambition and expertise that is literally world-changing.”
  • The Core Reading List: we have these ones – Blueberries for Sal; Ferdinand the Bull; Peter Rabbit; Winnie the Pooh; Are You My Mother? The ones we don’t have – Oh, The Places You’ll Go; Emma’s Pet; The Cat in the Hat; Horton Hatches the Egg; Even If I Did Something Awful; I’ll Love You Forever; The Monster at the End of This Book
  • The Degree Programme: maybe one day…..
  • The Formal Ball: we barely even get dressed up to go out for dinner, let alone to a formal ball. Is this perhaps a cultural thing?
  • The Assignment: we’ve only had a few Dissatisfaction moments with our eldest three so far. For one fo them, it was simply a matter of him not being ready to learn to read and so we encouraged him to find out what God was wanting to teach him through this apparent “slowness”. For the other two, I realise it’s just been a matter of knowing who your students are, what their personalities are, what they are struggling with and helping them along the path. This will obviously be an ongoing thing.
  • The Mission: need to spell this out
  • The Friend: sometimes I feel like I ahve too many friends-  I cannot be a good friend to them all – I have no answers to this dilemna.
  • The Core Phase Curriculum: I LOVE these two paragraphs. They encapsulate what we believe. They validate our choices - and just sometimes, that’s nice.
  • The Love of Learning Curriculum: I always feel inadequate in that I do not set a good enough example and do not give enough individual attention to each of the children and sometimes just get tired of them all. But apart from that, we seem to be doing most of the things mentioned on the list. 
  • Spring is for Science: we sure saw this at Western Springs yesterday. Could be a good time to break open some of the science-y books too. I’ll have a look on the shelf and see what grabs me.
  • Fall is for Beginnings: already decided above that autumn and spring are good times for the six-monthly-bits
  • The Subscription: don’t have any, but we do buy lots of books
  • The Dinner Meal: the children often take dinnertime as permission to show Dadda nad Grandpa what they have done that day. Another idea I like (not from this article) is to have a jar full of questions to pull out as conversation-starters. Might have to make one – maybe we could even do it as a family.
  • The Discipline “Yes”: isn’t this the beginning?
  • The Academic “Yes”: two books down, not counting how many to go!

09.28.07

he’s just not academic

Posted in education, review, think think think at 3:06 am by Rach

Hubby is reading “A Thomas Jefferson Education” and is enjoying it far less than I did.
He has already commented that he can see why I liked it – it’s jam-packed with validation of my chosen path for educating our children;-) But it’s simply too anecdotal and not scientific enough for The Hubby – it would appear I married a truly modern (as opposed to romantic or rennaissance or post-modern) man.

The statememts are too broad and sweeping.
I’ve been pondering this criticism.
Yes, DeMille says everyone is capable of getting a real education. Very broad. He reckons an individualised education for every student is the ideal. Even broader. He asserts most people will not get such an education as he is proposing. That sweeps most of us under the doormat, doesn’t it?
So, yes, he makes broad and sweeping statements.
But I wonder if it is any coincidence that we have been reading aloud about John Wycliffe this week. He argued *everyone* deserved to be educated – that “everyone” included serfs and females. SHOCK HORROR At least it was in the 1300s.
Thank goodness for his broad sweeping statement.

It’s not scientific enough.
We have come to revere the scientific method above personal stories or tradition or even(in many instances) divine revelation. 
DeMille could easily have quoted a raft of studies about how the American education system is failing (and we in New Zealand ought not to think we’re doing a whole lot better). The studies are out there, and I, for one, do not begrudge him not devoting book space to them. There are also studies that indicate very conclusively that home education (in any of the various forms it takes) is superior to public schooling. Those studies didn’t need to be in the book either – but they do exist for those who want to search them out and see numbers as proof.
Perhaps I am satisfied with the exclusion of such *scientific data*, because I am familiar with it. Perhaps I am just a bit more post-modern than my hubby.

An individualised education for every student is the ideal.
Why-ever-not? Of course, this is not the case in a conveyor-belt education. A truly individualised education is a bit wacky, extreme, perhaps even rebellious or lone-ranger-ish; it is certainly not an accepted societal norm. We like to think kids get to choose, but the choice between doing a project on polar bears or doing a project on panthers is not really an individualised education. But just because it has not or perhaps even can not be done in an institutionalised school, does not mean it is not a grand ideal. I would say it IS, even in its extreme-ness.
(Just a comment on the term *individualised*: I have heard people discussing this, obviously assuming it means kids get to do whatever they want all day long and and will therefore turn out very individualistic. I understand individualised to be more about finding out how God has created a person and tailoring their education to make the most of what gifts God has given them – there’s a huge difference in the two views)

Most people won’t get a leadership education.
Another broad, sweeping statement. But it is not lacking truth. Do I just not have problems with broad sweeping statements? heehee
Wycliffe believed every man, woman and child should be able to read God’s Word for themselves in the language that was most familiar to them. At the time this was an incredulous suggestion. Somewhat like suggesting everyone would do well to get a leadership education.
Again, thank goodness, for his wild and unpopular dream.

09.24.07

I’ve fallen in love again

Posted in juvenile, ramblings, think think think at 3:44 am by Rach

My mother has the complete set of Anne of Green Gables; hard cover, green with little pink flowers. Actually, she kindly passed it on to me, but it will always be known as “Grandma’s Set”.
I read them when I was – oh, about 13 or something – and couldn’t quite work out just why they were so famous. They struck me as old-fashioned and stuffy. But I read them.
More recently – much more recently, as in last year – I had the opportunity to read the script for a theatrical production of Anne, which a dear girlfriend had written. It captured me in a way the books hadn’t. I could *see* the chorus tripping across the stage! And I fell in love with the story.
But it was still with a little trepidation I picked up Anne for a second reading. Sharon, who so totally isn’t stuffy, had voted for Anne over Little Britches. What if I still didn’t like it? What would I say then? Would I have to refer to The Theatre Script for the rest of my days?
“Don’t be afraid” the pastor was saying as I left the church service due to a fractious 16-month-old. Walking around the courtyard in the fresh spring sun, I cracked open Anne. There was certainly no need to fear. I LOVED it. I laughed out loud. I nearly cried with her. I smiled understandingly. I drank in the descriptions and got to know the first few characters. I even found myself identifying with one who would not be anyone’s favourite out in the real world :-(

So why the different response? And why did my daughter enjoy the books at age eleven? I *think* it comes down to diet. I’ve noticed that kids who are brought up on Happy Meals and food that needs to be taken out of a wrapper before it can be consumed, tend to be less enthusiastic about ~ or at least a little suspicious of ~ vegetables and wholegrain homemade bread, than the ones for whom such fare is the norm.
When I tasted Anne for the first time, I had overdosed on the Famous Five and Trixie Belden. Nova Scotia was geographically and literar-illy a world away from my experience.
It was foreign to me.

But it was not foreign to my eleven-year-old. And when I apprehensively opened it this time, it was no longer foreign to me either. Our read-aloud sessions as a family have moved me from the relative safety of the farmyard in Charlotte’s Web to much more adventurous landscapes. We have struggled alongside Christian in Pilgrim’s Progress, we have found our lives enriched by the vocabulary of Rosemary Sutcliffe and Howard Pyle.

Now I was ready for Anne of Green Gables.
And I can’t wait to read it again! And to read all the others.

09.12.07

In the Shadow of Andersen

Posted in discussion, juvenile, parenting, think think think at 2:06 am by Rach

T3 and M5 were building with blocks at my feet as I typed. Their conversation entered my stream of consciousness! Here’s where I picked it up and joined in. I started to type as fast as my fingers would allow me, and left out the “please may you pass me the red one” and “shall we put this here?” comments.

M5: Are you being a copy cat?
T3: Yes I want to.
M5: Well ask Jesus and he could make you into a cat coz he’s the only one that’s magic.
T3: Is Jesus magic?
M5: Yes
Me: How do you know that?
M5: Well I know that He is. I just know. When I read the Bible it reminds me of that. Because when I was only 3 or 4 we read a book about Jesus died on the cross and rising from the dead.
Me: Is that magic?
M5: Yep.
Me: Could it be anything else?
M5: Yes
Me: What else could it be?
M5: Jesus makes the wind. Jesus makes people.
T3: Jesus - making - God (her words didn’t run together as a sentence!)
M5: Jesus IS God and God is Jesus.
T3: But sometimes he isn’t.
M5: Every time he, (somewhat distracted) all times He is…
T3: Why is He?
M5: Coz all times he is T3.
Me: Do you think magic is the same as God’s power?
M5: No.
Me: What’s the difference?
M5: Jesus. (pause) I don’t know.

 Three minutes of building while I edited the quickly poorly-typed conversation above and then it erupted again!

M5: I just started to know that Jesus is magic and that he could make things lay. Do cicadas? Like chickens lay eggs.

L6 entered.
Me: Is magic God?
L6: I’m not sure.
M5: When you were three did you go to preschool and read books about God, coz I did?
L6: There weren’t many books about God, but when I was four there were some books about God and Jesus. God and magic isn’t the same thing. I don’t really know what the difference is though.
Me: Is magic a person?
M5: Yes, it is, yes.
L6: It’s Jesus. Kind of. Yes and no.
Me: So, is God a person?
L6: No.
M5: Well God is Jesus.
L6: Well God isn’t a person. He doesn’t have a body like men (aha, quoting straight from the catchism we memorise!) But he did live on earth and was a human being. But now He’s invisible you can’t see Him.
M5: Sometimes He isn’t invisible.
L6: Am I allowed to go and play now?
Me: Sure.
M5: Well you CAN see Him, He’s the sky eh Mama?
Me: No! He MADE the sky.
L6: (who obviously didn’t go out to play!) It’s hard to believe He’s everywhere.
M5: It’s hard to believe that He’s in the sky and He’s all around the world eh. It’s hard to believe, eh Mama?
Me: It’s hard for me to understand. That’s for sure. But I can believe it, because God is so much bigger than me and He knows more so He knows how to make that happen.
L6: Are you writing it down?
Me: Yes!
L6giggle *big grin*
Me: What do you think?
L6: Very funny!
Me: Why?
L6: Coz I was just reading what you were writing and I thought, “I must ask her!” grin. giggle. chuckle. uncontrollable giggle
M5: L6, please may you stop laughing like that; it’s a sort of silly laugh.

When our older kids were younger, we didn’t read them ANY books about ghosts or witches or magic. I deleted it from the odd book that was (IMHO) otherwise fine…..I even changed the rhyme in one book. Other books we avoided altogether until later. Later arrived these past couple of weeks with our Hans Christian Andersen read-alouds.
Today’s conversation with the littlies reminded me *why* it is better to leave magic till later.
We’ll have an explicit chat about it sometime soon (the above conversation was just teasing out what they’re thinking) and then put away the magic until they are more mature in their understanding of reality.

And that’s how far I got before K10 came in. His entrance seemed to be an opportnity presenting itself to me, so I just had to enquire:
Me: Is magic God?
K10: What do you mean? He can do miracles, but I wouldn’t call it magic.
Me: What’s magic then?
K10: Hmmm? Not really sure. There is magic in stories. Real people can’t make magic. But in stories it can do all sorts of things.
Me: Is magic a person?
K10: It isn’t a person, but some people think they can do magic. Why do you want to know?
And so I read out all the above.

Enter K8 stage right.
I had to know. Would she be closer in her understanding to the six year old or the ten year old? She’s the one who only just recently realised that Thunderbirds are puppets (“You can actually see their mouths move” SHOCK!!!!) and she’s the one who had to ask if Anderesen’s The Darning Needle was true or not….so needless to say, I had my suspicions which way the dice was going to fall!

Me: Is magic God?
K8: No. Well, He can do anything, but that’s not really magic. God is different to a person, because he’s not really like anybody. But magic isn’t a person either.
Me: What is magic?
K8: It’s really like a circussy thing. Where they can hold poles on their hand with a person on it. It’s really all that I’ve seen. The other things that I saw at the circus were like shows more than magic stuff.
Me: What makes something magic stuff?
K8: It’s…most people can’t hold a pole on one hand with a person on the top.
Me: Is it being strong?
K8: Yes. It’s like when um when the clowns open up a book and fire comes out. And when the clown can open the drawer and the balls – you can’t see the balls and when he opens it another time you can see them. Or when the clown can hold a stick firm and when he gives it to someone else it all breaks.

There you have it.

09.05.07

questions

Posted in education, ramblings, think think think at 2:23 am by Rach

I’ve noticed my children ask different questions to their schooled peer group. Or, rather, I was surprised by the questions asked by some school kids I looked after recently. Whereas my kids tend to be full of ideas (too many sometimes – heehee), the visitors kept asking me ”What am I meant to do with this?” and “What does this do?” and “What’s this for?” I was intrigued that they turned to me for their answers instead of experimenting or coming up with their own posssible solutions. I was also surprised that once they had heard one answer, they were off. I guess I’ve got used to engaging in discussion rather than just question-n-answer-format. To be really honest, I shot questions back at those visiting children’s questions to encourage their own thinking, but on that one occasion I had three really good ideas spring to mind immediately, so decided just to tell them. They only heard the first one. All I can surmise is they thought that was THE answer and so there was no need to hear any more.

This is not to say that there are no good teachers in state schools or that government schools cannot teach children to use their imaginations. It’s just an observation of some interactions with some children that made me realise the *good* my own family is getting.

 (Sidenote: This post was a discipline post. I didn’t feel like writing. Just wanted to read. But I’m really keen to establish the habit of a daily paragraph or two, so I got that done first and am now going to curl up with Peter Rabbit and a little one who has just awoken!)

Next page